| |
Workshop
Organizers:
Fernanda B. Viégas IBM Research
Martin Wattenberg IBM Research
Jeffrey Heer University of California, Berkeley
Maneesh Agrawala University of California, Berkeley
|
|
Selected Submissions
Supporting Exploration in Social Data
Analysis
Adam Perer, Ben Shneiderman
University of Maryland
Social Data Analysis at Swivel:
Lessons Learned & Next Steps
Brent Fitzgerald, Sara E Wood
Swivel
Business User Empowerment through
Collaborative Analytics
Daniela Busse, Richard Hong
SAP Labs (Palo Alto)
Providing Social Transparency through
Visualizations in Wikipedia
Ed H. Chi, Bongwon Suh, Aniket Kittur
Palo Alto Research Center
Visualization Annotation at Internet
Scale
Eric Gilbert, Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois
Collaborative uses of personal health
information: a study of PatientsLikeMe
Jeana H. Frost, Michael P. Massagli
PatientsLikeMe
Encouraging Collaboration for
Unstructured Data Analysis
Julia Grace, Dan Gruhl, Kevin Haas, Christine Robson
IBM Almaden Research Center
Towards Enabling Social
Analysis of Scientific Data
Juliana Freire, Cláudio Silva
University of Utah
Perception of Congress on the Web: Data
Analysis Inspired by the Red Versus Blue United States Map
Kayce N. Reed, Dennis P. Groth
Indiana University
Social data analysis & physical
activity
Olivier Liechti, Christophe Burnet
University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland (HEIG-VD)
Social Data Analysis in Co-located
Environments
Petra Isenberg, Sheelagh Carpendale
University of Calgary
Seeing Ourselves among Others
Tony Bergstrom, Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois
Capturing and visualising
Bluetooth encounters
Vassilis Kostakos, Eamonn O’Neill
University of Bath
Call for Participation
(pdf)
This workshop addresses a new online phenomenon: social data analysis,
that is, collective analysis of data supported by social interaction.
In the last few months a new class of web site has emerged that enables
users to upload and collectively analyze many types of data. These
systems range from pure research projects to commercial business
ventures. Sites like Many Eyes, Swivel and Data360 have attracted
visualization fans, data geeks, journalists, scientists, and concerned
citizens. The blogosphere has also taken notice, and bloggers frequently
post about the ways in which they use these sites, the visualizations
they create, and the data they upload.
The goals of this workshop are to:
-- Bring together the community of researchers and practitioners
focused on social data analysis
-- Examine the design of social data analysis sites today
-- Discuss the role that visualizations play in social data
analysis
-- Explore the different ways users are utilizing the various
social data analysis sites to date
We seek researchers and practitioners whose work explores social data
analysis and/or social uses of visualizations. We hope for a lively mix
of people actively involved in building sites and academics who study
the dynamics of social software.
Submitting:
Individuals interested in participating should submit a 2-4 page
position paper describing experience with a social data analysis
initiative, a proposed initiative, or an analysis of an issue of
importance in this area.
New Submission deadline: October 31, 2007
Papers should conform to the CHI 2008 Extended Abstracts format and
should be emailed to:
social-data-analysis@lists.berkeley.edu
Workshop Extended
Abstract (pdf)
Theme
In 2004, as the US presidential elections drew to an end, Americans
started a lively online discussion about which states had voted “blue”
(Democratic) and which had voted “red” (Republican). Using data
available on the web, a group of people created a series of increasingly
sophisticated maps that fueled the public debate on politics and a
divided country. As the maps showed more nuanced versions of voting
patterns—first state based, later county based, and finally taking
population density into account (see images on the left)—they
illustrated the multiple narratives that can be extracted from the same
data. As Americans struggled to understand election results, the maps
became emblematic of the difficulties in representing complex data and
the richness behind collaboration around data.
We believe this kind of collective sensemaking is not an isolated
phenomenon, but rather an exciting example of social data analysis
around visualization.
In the last few months a new class of web site has emerged that enables
users to upload and collectively analyze many types of data. These
systems range from pure research projects to commercial business
ventures. In the research front, Many Eyes [6] has attracted
visualization fans with its interactive graphs. A number of governmental
and commercial systems have also begun to explore the idea of
communication around data: Dataplace [3], Data360 [2], DabbleDB [1],
Chartall [4], and Swivel [8]. These sites range from domain-specific
applications (Dataplace focuses on demographic information) to generic
tools for any kind of user-uploaded data.
Several of these sites boast thousands of user-uploaded data sets and
thousands more user-generated graphs. The blogosphere has also taken
notice, and bloggers frequently post about the different ways in which
they use these sites, the visualizations they create, and the data sets
they upload.
Data
Data analysis is traditionally thought of as something done by experts
in isolation or in small groups. Social data analysis, however, suggests
the possibility of massive collaboration in the discovery process,
involving experts and non-experts alike—perhaps a new frontier for
Web2.0 citizenry. This perspective is suggested by the rise of the Web
as a data platform. Recent years have witnessed internet-based data
publishing ranging from government-generated data to scientific
repositories of experimental data sets to data-oriented journalism (New
York Times stories (Faces of the Dead [7]). These data sets are
accessible to millions and it is natural to ask what new opportunities
arise when data sets move to an environment where vast crowds of people
can view and discuss them.
Visualization
Most of the above-mentioned sites have relied on visualization as an
inherent part of their Web 2.0 analytical arsenal. While it is true that
visual representations of data are helpful to many analyses, it is less
clear if there is anything intrinsically “collaborative” about
visualizations. Speculation suggests that interactive visualizations are
a key medium for communication of data-rich insights to others, and
preliminary reports hint that visualizations potentially have a
catalytic effect on conversation and potentially have a catalytic effect
on conversation and collective data analysis [5][9][10]. The question
persists: how central is visualization to social data analysis?
Goals
This workshop aims to:
1) Bring together the community of researchers and practitioners focused
on social data analysis
2) Examine the design of social data analysis sites today
3) Discuss the role that visualizations play in social data analysis
4) Explore the different ways users are utilizing the various social
data analysis sites to date
Participants
We welcome researchers and practitioners whose work explores social data
analysis and/or social uses of visualizations. We hope for a lively mix
of people actively involved in building sites and academics who study
the dynamics of social software. Because the workshop aims to bring
together a range of perspectives on communication-minded visualization,
the organizers will actively select papers and participants that
represent a diverse set of viewpoints.
Maximum Size
The workshop will have between 18 and 20 participants.
References
[1] DabbleDB. http://dabbledb.com/
[2] Data360. http://www.data360.org/
[3] Dataplace. http://www.dataplace.org/
[4] Chartall. http://www.chartall.com/
[5] Heer, J., Viégas, F., & Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and Voyeurs:
Supporting Asynchronous Collaborative Information Visualization. In
Proc. of SIGCHI 2007.
[6] Many Eyes. http://www.many-eyes.com/
[7] New York Times: Faces of the Dead. http://www.nytimes.com/ref/us/20061228_3000FACES_TAB1.html,
retrieved 03-30-2007.
[8] Swivel. http://swivel.com/
[9] Viégas, F., boyd, d., Nguyen, D., Potter, J. & Donath, J. Digital
Artifacts for Remembering and Storytelling: PostHistory and Social
Network Fragments. In Proc. of HICSS-37, 2004.
[10] Wattenberg, M. Baby Names, Visualization, and Social Data Analysis.
In Proc. of InfoVis 2005.
|