IBM
Skip to main content
 
Search IBM Research
     Home  |  Products & services  |  Support & downloads  |  My account
 Select a country
 IBM Research Home
Deep Blue
Overview/Home
The Match
 ·Post-Match Images
 ·Last year's match
 ·The rules of the rematch
 ·The Commentators
The Players
The Technology
The Community

Related Links
 Press room
 Chess conference
 Site guide
 Search Research
 Feedback
 
 


Deep Blue game 6: May 11 @ 3:00PM EDT | 19:00PM GMT        kasparov 2.5 deep blue 3.5


White: Kasparov
Black: Deep Blue
1. Nf3
d5
2. g3
Bg4
3. Bg2
Nd7
4. h3
Bxf3
5. Bxf3
c6
6. d3
e6
7. e4
Ne5
8. Bg2
dxe4
9. Bxe4
Nf6
10. Bg2
Bb4+
11. Nd2
h5
12. Qe2
Qc7
13. c3
Be7
14. d4
Ng6
15. h4
e5
16. Nf3
exd4
17. Nxd4
O-O-O
18. Bg5
Ng4
19. O-O-O
Rhe8
20. Qc2
Kb8
21. Kb1
Bxg5
22. hxg5
N6e5
23. Rhe1
c5
24. Nf3
Rxd1+
25. Rxd1
Nc4
26. Qa4
Rd8
27. Re1
Nb6
28. Qc2
Qd6
29. c4
Qg6
30. Qxg6
fxg6
31. b3
Nxf2
32. Re6
Kc7
33. Rxg6
Rd7
34. Nh4
Nc8
35. Bd5
Nd6
36. Re6
Nb5
37. cxb5
Rxd5
38. Rg6
Rd7
39. Nf5
Ne4
40. Nxg7
Rd1+
41. Kc2
Rd2+
42. Kc1
Rxa2
43. Nxh5
Nd2
44. Nf4
Nxb3+
45. Kb1
Rd2
46. Re6
c4
47. Re3
Kb6
48. g6
Kxb5
49. g7
Kb4
50. Draw!



Game 5, white
21.Kb1

Commentary for white move 21:

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Well, we became world champion in 1994, and since then nothing has happened. Basically they ignore us. They now know that computers are better than all the humans, but it hasn't diminished the game in one way. People still play in tournaments, they enjoy the competition, they have a lot of fun.

GK MOVE: 2 1 Kb1

MAURICE ASHLEY: Kasparov has also moved his king off the possible sensitive diagonal to the square b1. Continue.

MIKE VALVO: I was just wondering, Jonathan is also a well-known computer chess programmer as well. He had a machine in a number of events that I ran. It was called Phoenix. Before chinook, he went over to chinook. I'd like to ask you why you gave up on chess computers, first of all, and I'd like you to continue on what has happened to the checker world since the wormed champion is now a machine.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Do you want the honest answer?

MIKE VALVO: Well, I don't want a dishonest one.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Well, I know Murray Campbell very well. In fact by strange coincidence in 1974 we both were in the Canadian junior chess championship and we played in the second round.

MAURICE ASHLEY: Murray Campbell being a member of the Deep Blue team.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: So we've known each other for a long, long time. 1989 at a sabbatical at Carnegie-Mellon where Feng Hsu and Murray Campbell were at and I heard about of course the Deep Blue -- or the IBM arrangement, and I began to think about my prospects with my chess program. Although it was one of the best in the world, one person working part time with no money on a chess program, it's very difficult to compete with the Deep Blue people having several people full time and the full backing of IBM. And coincidentally at that time I started tinkering with the checkers program and I made the decision if I wanted to win with a chess program it was the wrong place to be simply because of too much competition.

MIKE VALVO: Let me ask you a tickling kind of question. Is checkers easier than chess?

AUDIENCE MEMBER: First of all, I'm a chess player. I got involved in check /SKPERZ didn't know anything about it. I heard a lot of people say who cares about checkers, it's such an easy game.

MIKE VALVO: Jonathan is a Chessmaster, by the way.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: I also heard someone say Samuel solved the game of checkers in 1963.

MIKE VALVO: That wasn't true, right?

MIKE VALVO: A historical accident. What you can say about chess and checkers is there there's 10 to the 45th approximately possible chess positions, there's a 1 followed by 45 /SKPWHRAOERZ. Checkers is only a 1 followed by 20 zeros, so you can say --

MIKE VALVO: Relatively nothing.

Real-time text commentary is made possible by LiveNote, Inc. and Vincent Varallo Associates




  


Related Information

      Program of events:

 
      Chess links:

 
  About IBM  |  Privacy  |  Legal  |  Contact