Game 4, black
23...Ndc5
Commentary for black move 23:
MAURICE ASHLEY: Sounds good. Well, so, the next move by
Kasparov will be critical, and I'm sure the move Nc3 came as a
bit of a surprise to him, and we're getting to the end of the
third quarter for Kasparov. His time now, 32 minutes and
ticking down. A suppliesing -- surprising move I think the
move Nc3, the doubling back, and I think he's going to have to
be very concerned. I think this is a move he could have easily
dismissed, just suddenly "think about that, just go back." And
spending some time now, if you look at him, he had a very clear
plan --
GK MOVE: 23...Ndc5
MAURICE ASHLEY: Still Ne4 is not possible, but Kasparov may
instead be intending the move d5-d4. But that wouldn't give
him any support to his e4 square so that's one possibility.
Ne4 certainly is out. This is not a possibility, but d4 would
simply be responded to by Nd1, so I'm going to have to hesitate
a bit on this one. He may be intending Nd4, this is a
possibility, Nd4 hitting the f2 square.
And we'd like to welcome back Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan.
There have been some strange moves, some funky moves, trying
to
figure out why these strange moves have been played. Kasparov
is looking very confident in the meantime with all these
sacrificial ideas. I'm going to leave you, better than anyone
here on stage, to try and explain it -- and you better explain
it! -- and I'm going to take my leave.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Thank you. Maurice Ashley.
MIKE VALVO: Don't we have a guest pretty soon?
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Right now, in fact just to bail me out. It is
a very, very tough position. I have spoken to one of the
managers, if you will, for Garry Kasparov, Andrew /KA* page, he
had asked me how Garry is doing, and I said well, an early
prediction is Garry is going to win a tactical brilliancy or
lose a strategical --
MIKE VALVO: Masterpiece.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Masterpiece, thank you. Because he had
taken
on these weak pawns. He had damaged his pawn structure and
he
has these two weak pawns. At the same time he's built up a
great deal of compensation that he had to have sacrificed a
pawn. A beautiful majority of 4 verst 2 over here but the
occupation of the f4 square could be compensation. Anything
could still happen. We'll look at this position in a moment in
some detail.
But first we're very honored today. We have a woman who is
going
to join us on stage. She is an International Grandmaster. She
is two-time U.S. woman's champion, current champion /-FTD
United States, twice on the Olympic team of the United States,
and in her recent outing on the owe limbpy add, she was the
first board. Her name is Angelina Bela sky a. And I hope I
pronounced it correctly. A nice part about introducing a woman
you get to kiss them on stage. Okay, the aweience wants to
know what's going on! The last few moves, Angelina, did you
like Garry's decision of f6? I just want to go back.
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: Of f6?
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Yeah.
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: Yeah, I think it was very interesting.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: You like it? Or you would have played it?
It's going to lead to these kinds of positions where black has
to do something tactically to overcome a strategical problem.
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: I can tell you if he was going to play
Qxf6,
I would definitely have played f6.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: So all of these moves were quite natural,
white
is trying to control the e5 square. Black the f-file. How did
you evaluate the position at this point?
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: From the openings this, game Kasparov
played
very different from the second one.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Oh, yes.
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: And I think it's a nice strategy because
with the black pieces, yes, you can try to go out of its
environs. When he plays with the white pieces it's probably
better to go to main line and get an advantage in the
position. So today he played with the black pieces and it was
a position that he does good. Because most of the time Garry
play Sicilian, it's his opening, and of course it seems like
he's just a little scared to play Sicilian against the
computer, and this is why he made a decision to play Caro-Kann
which finally get to the French defense without the bishop on
c8.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: I'm sorry to interrupt you. Somehow I'm
having
trouble getting back to the game position. And I just wanted
to say that the move e5 -- e6-e5 struck me as a good idea.
Black has activated his knights, and Deep Blue has fiddled around,
with the move Nc3-d1, back to c3. And
black
has great pressure, great pressure for a pawn, but a pawn is a
pawn. That's a computer strength?
ANGELINA BELASKAYA: Yeah, because sometimes when you
sacrifice a
pawn, and you get get active position for your pieces, it's
much better, it's easy for you to play because you don't have
to worry about your pieces, where to find a good place. The
position is very open. But sometimes you don't have enough
compensation, and a pawn is a pawn.
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Exactly. I'd like to take the opportunity to
invite the audience to ask questions of Angelina. Do we have
some questions? Yes, sir?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: I'd like to ask this question of all of you.
Joe earlier stated that he believed it would not be long before
computers were significantly superior to any human players. I
think you tapped him on the back or knocked him on the back?
YASSER SEIRAWAN: No, I was about to hit him, yeah. Just to be
clear.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Do you each individually agree with this, or
disagree, or not have an opinion?
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Mike, will you start us off?
MIKE VALVO: Well, I think that computers will eventually be
better than humans. But right now, there only seems to be one
that is in the same category as humans and that's this
machine. There are others that are close, but are maybe a
class behind this machine, just like Garry is almost a class
better than the rest of the world it may be five years before
we can really get super nervous, but I think a lot of
Grandmasters are getting nervous now, thinking "Gee, what's
going to happen to my livelihood?"
YASSER SEIRAWAN: Angela, what about you, do you think
computers
are going to eventually usurp our supremacy?
Real-time text commentary is made possible by LiveNote, Inc. and
Vincent Varallo Associates