IBM
Skip to main content
 
Search IBM Research
     Home  |  Products & services  |  Support & downloads  |  My account
 Select a country
 IBM Research Home
Deep Blue
Overview/Home
The Match
 ·Post-Match Images
 ·Last year's match
 ·The rules of the rematch
 ·The Commentators
The Players
The Technology
The Community

Related Links
 Press room
 Chess conference
 Site guide
 Search Research
 Feedback
 
 


Deep Blue game 6: May 11 @ 3:00PM EDT | 19:00PM GMT        kasparov 2.5 deep blue 3.5


White: Kasparov
Black: Deep Blue
1. Nf3
d5
2. g3
Bg4
3. b3
Nd7
4. Bb2
e6
5. Bg2
Ngf6
6. 0-0
c6
7. d3
Bd6
8. Nbd2
0-0
9. h3
Bh5
10. e3
h6
11. Qe1
Qa5
12. a3
Bc7
13. Nh4
g5
14. Nhf3
e5
15. e4
Rfe8
16. Nh2
Qb6
17. Qc1
a5
18. Re1
Bd6
19. Ndf1
dxe4
20. dxe4
Bc5
21. Ne3
Rad8
22. Nhf1
g4
23. hxg4
Nxg4
24. f3
Nxe3
25. Nxe3
Be7
26. Kh1
Bg5
27. Re2
a4
28. b4
f5
29. exf5
e4
30. f4
Bxe2
31. fxg5
Ne5
32. g6
Bf3
33. Bc3
Qb5
34. Qf1
Qxf1+
35. Rxf1
h5
36. Kg1
Kf8
37. Bh3
b5
38. Kf2
Kg7
39. g4
Kh6
40. Rg1
hxg4
41. Bxg4
Bxg4
42. Nxg4+
Nxg4
43. Rxg4
Rd5
44. f6
Rd1
45. g7
1-0


Game 1, white
15.e4

Commentary for white move 15:

Mr. SEIRAWAN: Well, the problem, I think it kind of works both ways. This bishop on f3 is quite annoying. I think that Garry would be delighted if through an exchange of bishops on g2, his king could recapture on g2, he could then potentially play Rh1 and penetrate with his rook down on the h-file. So as long as this bishop remains on f3, it's a bit awkward. The thing that Deep Blue has to be concerned about is that if this pawn ever gets -- if the F-pawn ever marches up the board, black is going to be in trouble. So a move that suggests itself is move like Rd8-d6 to try to control the f-pawn a bit.

Mr. SEIRAWAN: And still, I must say, it's not like Garry's got a real good grip on the position that he can just say, "Okay, now I'm going to slam home any advantage."

Mr. ASHLEY: The other thing that we do have to be concerned about is -- that Garry has to be concerned about; I've got nothing to worry about, because I'm not playing! But Garry has to be concerned about is that this mention -- I don't know if you heard, the fact that his strategy of keeping the position quiet didn't work. The fact that he was trying to milk these advantages, if this game ends up being a draw, he failed, really.

Mr. SEIRAWAN: Right. He did.

Mr. ASHLEY: Qa5 was played, Bc7 was played, g5 was played, three moves that we criticized heavily --

Mr. SEIRAWAN: Right.

Mr. ASHLEY: -- and yet the computer is fine. Will this always happen? Can it always compensate for his superior positional knowledge and has now played the move h5 -- it K it always compensate for his superior positional knowledge with this incredible tactical sense?

Real-time text commentary is made possible by LiveNote, Inc. and Vincent Varallo Associates




  


Related Information

      Program of events:

 
      Chess links:

 
  About IBM  |  Privacy  |  Legal  |  Contact